Home » Headline, Provincial

Two polls define Ontario voters

3 October 2011 2 Comments
Two polls define Ontario voters

There were two polls released over the weekend that showed an interesting side of Ontario voters.  The first was a Sun Media/Leger Marketing poll that showed 2/3 of Ontarians don’t trust Dalton McGuinty to hold the line on taxes.  They believe that under a McGuinty government, taxes will probably go up.  The second is a Nanos Research poll that shows the Liberal party and the PC party are tied for the October 6th election.  The only conclusion I can come up with to explain the two polls is that Ontario voters don’t mind paying more in taxes if it means no service cuts.

And I can back this up with conversations I’ve had with many friends who are not political wonks.  The fact is what they care for most is that the services they want are there and available when they need them, specifically education and healthcare.  For this comfort, they are willing to pay more taxes even though they know that money is being wasted and things could be managed better.  The threat of the services deteriorating or being taken away overrides their desire for lower taxes.

Tim Hudak has done a good job in defining his party as the party that will lower hydro rates and other fees and taxes.  Most Ontarians will have more money in their pocket under a PC government.  But what the Liberals have argued is that voters will probably lose healthcare services or get education cutbacks in order to achieve these tax savings.  The Liberals are successfully asking “Is that risk worth the dollars you save?”  Most Ontarians are not too sure about that.

Of course, Hudak is staunchly saying that the province is being managed so poorly that they can achieve both tax cuts and continue to invest in the priority services.  But the question that the PCs have three days to answer is if the province’s finances get worse over the next few years, which promise prevails: lowering taxes or continuing investment in healthcare?  I don’t think there is any other way to square the two polls.

2 Comments »

  • Nathan Willard said:

    Blake,

    This is a well balance approach to understanding not only the different poll results, but the mood of the Ontario voters. I must admit, after weeks of constantly touting the PC banner, you truly outdone yourself by presenting a balanced approach to what is going on in the Ontario election.

    Very admirable and respectable.

    Cheers.

  • Bruce Ricketts said:

    I think that is a fair analysis, Blake. I would go one step further to remind your readers that we just went through the worst recession since the 30′s. Combine that with the globalization trend and the result is that Ontario, as a non-energy province, would not have fared better under a regime of any stripe. To pull us out of our debt trap, a result, largely, of the financial system failures and the recession, will require the two pillars of maximized revenues and minimized expenditures. To suggest that you can cut one and raise another is a fools game. The feds are finding, as we speak, that the rhetoric of “fat in government” is a lot overblown. Sure there is room for improvement in anything, but to suggest that you can balance a budget with minimized revenues while not affecting expenditures (vice versa) is a fools game, regardless of who says it.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.